It’s not really possible to open The Casual Vacancy without a lot of expectations both high and low at the same time crashing around in your brain and distorting your vision. I don’t know if it’s possible or even desirable to avoid them. I know I had a lot of, let’s call them feelings when I opened the book (which happened on Saturday morning; don’t ask; I work for the military-industrial-entertainment complex, let’s just leave it at that). I have spent many, many hours reading Rowling’s work. I am a known Harry Potter fan.
I also know enough literary sabermetrics to know that the odds of the book being good were not short. A lot of young adult authors, great ones, have tried their hands at literary fiction, and not a lot of them have succeeded. Not even Roald Dahl could switch-hit, and not for lack of trying. All the available evidence suggests that it’s just a different kind of talent. The most successful example I can think of is T.S. Eliot writing both The Waste Land and also Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats. And that’s not even a very good example.
But after about ten pages of The Casual Vacancy I began to forget about all that stuff, and online rumors about how the book was amazing or awful or had lots of sex in it. I forgot about how I had three days to write a review of a 500-page book. I forgot about everything except the pages in front of me. Because I had come under the spell of a great novel.
What surprised me about The Casual Vacancy was not just how good it was, but the way in which it was good. I suppose I’d expected a kind of aged-up, magicked-down Harry Potter, something that showcased the same strengths the Potter books do: Rowling’s meticulous plotting, her inventiveness, her love of mischief, her likeable characters, her knack for visual spectacle. I also expected it to showcase her weaknesses, because all writers have them. Yes, I’m a fanboy, but I still think the Potter books have too many adverbs in them, and not enough sex.
But The Casual Vacancy is a different beast entirely. It was not what I was expecting. It’s a big, ambitious, brilliant, profane, funny, deeply upsetting and magnificently eloquent novel of contemporary England, rich with literary intelligence and entirely bereft of bullshit, and if it weren’t for Rowling’s stringent security measures it would or at least should have contended for the Booker Prize. This is a deeply moving book by somebody who understands both human beings and novels very, very deeply. It’s as if Rowling were an animagus, except that instead of turning into a stag or a dog or whatever she transformed into Ian McEwan.
Strange Random Tennis Quote:
- Wimbledon 2012: Why Novak Djokovic Should Be Considered the Favorite (bleacherreport.com)
- Confidence on tennis court key to success (reporternews.com)
- “New Balls Please” – Inspiration for A Wimbledon Tennis Afternoon Tea (teawithmarykate.wordpress.com)
- Five apps to help you prepare for the non-stop tennis of Wimbledon (tuaw.com)
- The Federal Reserve owns a tennis court! (adirondacktennis.wordpress.com)
- Wimbledon pic of the day (adirondacktennis.wordpress.com)
- Wimbledon Championship Tennis Breaks (findcottageholidays.com)
- Wimbledon 2012: Nadal, Djokovic, Federer Won 28 Of Past 29 Majors (huffingtonpost.com)
- Self Catering Cottages with Tennis Courts, Tennis Breaks in UK and Ireland (findcottageholidays.com)
Sam Bompas, a so-called foodsmith, said Montagu probably wasn’t the first to think of the idea.
“Other people were probably eating in that way anyway but they were people who weren’t written about,” he said.
It’s possible the sandwich could have been named something else entirely. The first earl of Sandwich had the opportunity to choose Portsmouth instead of Sandwich when he was offered a peerage in 1660, said Steve Laslett, one of the organizers of the Sandwich Celebration Festival taking place Saturday and Sunday.
“Today we could be eating a Portsmouth,” he said.
The 11th earl of Sandwich, also named John Montagu, is scheduled to host a lunch Sunday.
“I am delighted to wish a happy 250th birthday to the sandwich,” he said.
Strange Random Sandwich Quote:
“I don’t need music, lobster or wine
Whenever your eyes look into mine;
The things I long for are simple and few:
A cup of coffee, a sandwich–and you!”
- How the sandwich began (jcfromanshan.wordpress.com)
- English town celebrates 250 years of the sandwich (radionz.co.nz)
- Town hosts festival for sandwich (bbc.co.uk)
- Ten Adorable Sandwiches To Say Happy Birthday, Sandwiches! (buzzfeed.com)
- Sandwich turns 250 and we celebrate Toronto’s most creative version of 2012 (thestar.com)
- A history of popular sandwiches (lfpress.com)
There are still cabins left on the second of two cruises that will mark the 100th anniversary of the Titanic sinking this April.
The first cruise scheduled, the Titanic Memorial Cruise, sold out more than a year ago. The second one, scheduled last September, leaves April 10 from New York City, the same day the Titanic embarked on its doomed journey from Southampton, England, in 1912.
U.K. travel agent Miles Morgan, the organizer of both sailings, said the second cruise is 70% sold out, and that the remaining cabins are on sale for 50% off.
The eight-night Titanic Anniversary Sailing, on the 710-passenger Azamara Journey, will visit Halifax, Canada, where passengers can visit the Fairview Lawn Cemetery, the final resting place for many of Titanic’s victims, before arriving at the exact site of Titanic’s sinking on April 14, when memorial services will be held.
A final commemoration will take place at 2:20 a.m. on April 15, marking the 100th year anniversary of the ship’s sinking, and paying tribute to the passengers and crew that perished. The vessel returns to New York on April 18.
The sold-out Titanic Memorial Cruise, on Fred Olsen Lines’ 1,230-passenger Balmoral, departs Southampton, England, on April 8, and will follow the ship’s original route westward across the Atlantic to New York.
Strange Random Titanic Quote:
“Just think of all those women on the Titanic who said, “No, thank you,” to dessert that night. And for what!” – Erma Bombeck (U.S. humorist, 1927-1996)
- Halifax plans tributes for Titanic sinking centenary (cbc.ca)
- Take a Replica Cruise of the Titanic’s Ill-Fated Maiden Voyage (newsfeed.time.com)
- Would You Take a Replica Cruise of the Titanic’s Maiden Voyage? (newsfeed.time.com)
- 100th Anniversary Inspires Titanic Marketing Blitz (livescience.com)
- Sneak Peek of Titanic Cruise? (foxnews.com)
- Cruise Lines to Retrace Titanic’s Journey, Aiming for Better Result (livescience.com)
- School Children Worldwide to Benefit from Titanic Cruise Aboard Azamara Journey (prweb.com)
- Carnival to mark centenary of Titanic sinking slammed as ¿insensitive¿ by family of magnate who built ship (dailymail.co.uk)
- Have $60,000 To Spare? Take A Luxury Cruise To See The Sunken Titanic (businessinsider.com)
In a few weeks, a group of British researchers will enter the labyrinthine store of London’s Natural History Museum and remove several dark-coloured pieces of primate skull and jawbone from a small metal cabinet. After a brief inspection, the team will wrap the items in protective foam and transport them to a number of laboratories across England. There the bones and teeth, which have rested in the museum for most of the last century, will be put through a sequence of highly sensitive tests using infra-red scanners, lasers and powerful spectroscopes to reveal each relic’s precise chemical make-up.
The aim of the study, which will take weeks to complete, is simple. It has been set up to solve a mystery that has baffled researchers for 100 years: the identities of the perpetrators of the world’s greatest scientific fraud, the Piltdown Hoax. Unearthed in a gravel pit at Piltdown in East Sussex and revealed to the outside world exactly a century ago, those shards of skull were part of a scientific scam that completely fooled leading palaeontologists. For decades they believed they were the remains of a million-year-old apeman, an individual who possessed a large brain but primitive jawbone and teeth.
The news of the Piltdown find, first released in late 1912, caused a sensation. The first Englishman had been uncovered and not only was he brainy, he was sporty. A sculpted elephant bone, found near the skull pieces and interpreted by scientists as being a ceremonial artefact, was jokingly claimed by many commentators to be an early cricket bat. The first Englishman with his own cricket bat – if nothing else it was one in the eye for French and German archaeologists whose discoveries of Cro-Magnons, Neanderthals and other early humans had been making headlines for several decades. Now England had a real fossil rival.
It was too good to be true. As decades passed, scientists in other countries uncovered more and more fossils of early apemen that differed markedly from Piltdown Man. “These had small skulls but relatively humanlike teeth – the opposite of Piltdown,” says Professor Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum, who is leading the new study. “But many British scientists did not take them seriously because of Piltdown. They dismissed these discoveries which we now know are genuine and important. It really damaged British science.”
Strange Random Hoax Quote:
“I created hoaxes. I confronted and challenged the majority opinion. I attacked, humiliated, and criticized the voice of the corporate mainstream media.” – Joey Skaggs
- Atlantis Rising’s Micheal Cremo and the Calaveras Skull (ahotcupofjoe.net)
- Skeptic History: Archaeological Fakes (randi.org)
- Three down, one to go … (ikejakson.wordpress.com)
- The Largest Frauds in History (socyberty.com)